By Daniel G. Groody, c.s.c.
Daniel G. Groody is a Roman Catholic priest, scholar, and award-winning author and film producer. He teaches at the
University of Notre Dame, where he is Assistant Professor of Theology and Director of the Center for Latino Spirituality
and Culture at the Institute for Latino Studies. He spent many years working in Latin America, particularly along the
U.S.- Mexican Border. He is also executive producer of various films and documentaries, including Strangers No Longer and
Dying to Live: A Migrant’s Journey. For more information see www.nd.edu/~dgroody or www.dyingtolive.nd.edu.
( Find this artical at http://communitas.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/REFLECT1GROODY.pdf )
A few years ago I was working in Mexico at a border outreach center that offered material and pastoral support to those on the move. Some were traveling northwards in search of better lives, and others had tried to enter the U.S. but failed and were deported back to Mexico.
The story of Mario, Maria and Gustavo gives witness to their particular journey across the U.S.-
Mexico border, but its dynamics are universal in scope. Today there are more than 200 million people
migrating around the world, or one out of every thirty-five people on the planet, which is equivalent
to the population of Brazil. Some 30-40 million of these are undocumented, 24 million are internally
displaced and about 10 million are refugees.1 For many reasons some scholars refer to these days
as the “age of migration,” touching every area of human life.2 The immigration issue underscores
not only conflict at geographical borders but the turbulent crossroads between national security and
human insecurity, national sovereign rights and human rights, civil law and natural law, and citizenship
The only place available to them was a small plot of land, where they built a cardboard shack, located
above an animal shelter that had hundreds of dogs, which barked all through the night. “Even many of
the animals here live better than we do here,” said one refugee, part of a group from India that was
seeking work in the European Union. “It is as if we are worth nothing to the people who live here, and
if we die, it won’t matter.”
The insults they endure are not just a direct assault on their pride but on their very existence. Their
vulnerability and sense of meaninglessness weigh heavily on them; they often feel that the most difficult
part of being an immigrant is to be no one to anyone. The Imago Dei brings to the forefront the
human costs embedded in the immigration equation, and it challenges a society more oriented towards
profit than people to accept that the economy should be made for people and not people for the
economy. It is a reminder that the moral health of an economy is measured by how well the most vulnerable
are faring.5 The Imago Dei insists that we see immigrants not as problems to be solved but
people to be healed and empowered.
Crossing Borders: Jesus the Refugee
The second theological notion that is central to the immigration debate is the Verbum Dei. It declares
that God in Jesus crosses the divide that exists between divine life and human life. In the incarnation
God migrates to the human race and, as Karl Barth notes, makes his way into the “far country.” 6 This
far country is one of human discord and disorder, a place of division and dissension, a territory marked
by death and the demeaning treatment of human beings. The Gospel of Matthew says God in Jesus not
only takes on human flesh and migrates into our world but actually becomes a refugee himself when
he and his family flee political persecution and escape into Egypt (Matt 2:13-15). The divine takes on
not just any human narrative but that of the most vulnerable among us. This movement toward the
human race takes place not on the strength of any human initiative or human accomplishment but
through divine gratuity. Walking the way of the cross, overcoming the forces of death that threaten human
life, Jesus gives hope to all who go through the agony of economic injustice, family separation,
cultural uprootedness, and even a premature and painful death. Certainly migrants who cross the
deserts in search of more dignified lives see in the Jesus story their own story: he opens up a reason to
hope despite the most hopeless of circumstances. Amid these contentious debates, much has been
written about the social, political, economic, cultural dimensions of immigration. But surprisingly very
little has been written from a theological perspective, even less from the vantage point of the immigrants
themselves. Yet the theme of migration is as old as the Scriptures. From the call of Abraham to
the Exodus from Egypt, from Israel’s wandering in the desert to their experience of exile, from the holy
family’s flight into Egypt to the missionary activity of the Church, the very identity of the People of God is
inextricably intertwined with stories of movement, risk and hospitality.
Broken Borders: God’s Migration
But what exactly can theology offer to this complex issue of immigration? Here I will highlight three
Christian themes that touch directly on the migration debate and help us understand that crossing
borders is at the heart of human life, divine revelation and Christian identity. These three areas are
the Imago Dei (the Image of God), the Verbum Dei (the Word of God) and the Missio Dei (the Mission
of God).4 The notion of the Imago Dei emerges in the earliest pages of Scripture. We read in the first creation
account that human beings are created in God’s image and likeness (Gen 1:26-27). No text is more
foundational or more significant in its implication for the immigration debate. It reveals that immigration
is not just about a political “problem” but about real people.
The Imago Dei is the core symbol of human dignity, the infinite worth of every human being, and the divine attributes that are part of every
human life, including will, memory, emotions, understanding, and the capacity to love and enter
into relationship with others. Listening to stories of immigrants along the U.S.-Mexico border, as well as the borders between
Slovakia-Ukraine, Malta-Libya, and others, I have discovered that a common denominator around the
world among all who migrate is their experience of dehumanization.
I recently was speaking with a group of refugees in the Spanish-occupied territory of Ceuta on the
Moroccan coast. They took me up to the mountains to meet some people from India, who were
hiding out in cardboard shacks in the mountains. The Imago Dei insists that we see
immigrants not as problems to be solved but people to be healed and empowered34 and reminds us that our own existence as a pilgrim
people is migratory in nature.
Theology offers not just more information but a new imagination, one that reflects at its core what
it means to be human before God and to live together in community. In seeking to overcome all
that divides us in order to reconcile us in all our relationships, Christian discipleship reminds us that
the more difficult walls to cross are the ones that exist in the hearts of each of us. Unable to cross this
divide by ourselves, Christian faith rests ultimately in the one who migrated from heaven to earth, and
through his death and resurrection, passed over from death to life. From a Christian perspective,
the true aliens are not those who lack political documentation but those who have so disconnected
themselves from their neighbor in need that they fail to see in the eyes of the stranger a mirror of
themselves, the image of Christ (Matt 25:31-46), and the call to human solidarity.
What impresses me most in speaking to migrants in the midst of their arduous journey is their ability
to believe in God even in the most godless of situations. They speak about trusting in God even
after all has been taken away, and they affirm God’s goodness even when their lot has been marked by
such suffering and pain. A third notion from theology that gives us a different
way of understanding immigration is the Missio Dei. The mission of the Church is to proclaim
a God of life and make our world more human by building up, in Pope Paul VI’s words, the “civilization
of love.” In imitation of Jesus, it seeks to make real the practice of table fellowship. The significance
of Jesus’ table fellowship with sinners and social outcasts is that he crosses over the human borders
that divide one human being from another. If the incarnation is about God crossing over the
divine-human divide, the mission of the Church is to cross the human-human divide. It is fundamentally
a mission of reconciliation, a realization that the borders that define countries may have some
proximate value but are not ultimately those that define the body of Christ.
Beyond Borders: Civilization of Love
One of the most remarkable ritual expressions of this unity takes place each year near El Paso, Texas.
In the dry, rugged, sun-scorched terrain where many immigrants lose their lives, bishops, priests, and
lay people come together annually to celebrate the Eucharist. Like at other liturgies, they pray and worship
together. Unlike other liturgies, a sixteen-foot high iron fence divides this community in half, with
one side in Mexico and the other in the U.S. Amid a desert of death and a culture of fear, this Eucharist
is not just a tool for activism or social reform but a testimony of God’s universal, undivided, and unrestricted
love for all people. It speaks of the gift and challenge of Christian faith and the call to feed the
world’s hunger for peace, justice and reconciliation. In uniting people beyond the political constructions
that divide us, it gives tangible expression to the moral demands of the Kingdom of God, the ethical
possibilities of global solidarity, and the Christian vision of a journey of hope.
Immigration is arguably the most challenging issue of the new century, but this need not blind us
to the core issues that lay at the heart of every one of us. How we respond to those most in need says
more about who we are individually and collectively than it does about those on the move. Theology
supplies a way of thinking about migration that keeps the human issues at the center of the debate.
One day a group of forty immigrants arrived in the center, sojourners who had hoped to reach the U.S.
It had been a long night for them – and an even longer week. For three days they had crossed through
the Arizona desert in temperatures that reach 120 degrees in the shade. Amid the challenges of the
desert terrain – their personal vulnerability to everything from heat stroke to poisonous snakes – they
had braved a perilous journey and tried to make their way to the U.S., often under the cover of darkness.
They walked remote and diffuse trails that have taken the lives of thousands of immigrants –
an estimated 300-500 annually since 1994. Why were they willing to take such risks and leave
their home country? When I asked them, some said they had relatives back home who needed medication
they could not afford. Others said the $3-$5 a day they earned for a twelve-hour work day in Mexico
was not enough to put much more than beans and tortillas on the table. Still others said potato chips
had become a luxury they could no longer afford, and they could not stand to look their children in
the eyes when they complained of hunger. The Desert Ordeal “We are migrating not because we want to but because
we have to,” said Mario. “My family at home depends on me. I’m already dead in Mexico, and getting to the U.S. gives us the hope of living, even
though I may die.” But now they were back on the border after a week-long ordeal. While walking through the Arizona
desert, they had suddenly heard a rumbling sound on the horizon. Then a white laser-like light
cut their world in two. Within moments a border patrol helicopter surrounded them and threw the
group into chaos. “So they circled around us and then rounded us up like we were cattle,” said Maria. “I said, no, dear
God … I’ve gone through so much sacrifice to come this far … please don’t let them send us back where
we came from.” “It was an awful night,” added Gustavo. “But the worst part was when they started playing the
song, ‘La Cucaracha’ over the helicopter intercom. I never felt so humiliated in my life, like I was the
lowest form of life of earth, like I wasn’t even a human being.”
1 For more on these statistics, see the website for the International Organization for Migration, http://
2 Stephen Castles and Mark J. Miller, The Age Of Migration: International Population Movements In The
Modern World (London: The Guilford Press, 2003).
3 Daniel G. Groody and Gioacchino Campese, eds., A Promised Land, A Perilous Journey: Theological
Perspectives on Migration (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008)
4 This article is drawn in part from a longer essay that will appear in Theological Studies in 2009.
5 These themes are particularly brought out in Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic
Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy, Washington, D.C: National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1986.
6 Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics, IV.1, “The Doctrine of Reconciliation,” trans. G. W. Bromiley, ed. G.W.
Bromiley and T.F. Torrance (London: T&T Clark International, 1956/2004), 157-210.